§Contract Desk Open the partner account
Affiliate disclosure. The partner link in the masthead and beside the copy on this page is a sponsored link to a partner operator, and this site may be paid if you open an account through it, at no extra cost to you. It carries rel="sponsored noopener" and opens in a new tab. That matters more than usual on this desk: the subject here is a contract drafted by one side of a commercial relationship, and this site's own funding is a referral fee from the other side of it. There is no ranking, no review and no recommendation of any operator or offer anywhere on this site.
Contract Desk / What binds by reference
Incorporation

The documents you were never given

One short clause can make a dozen documents binding without copying a word of any of them. This page is about finding the sentence that does it, and about what a reader can realistically do afterwards.

The clause you accepted: dated, and versionedThe wording that moves a decision: a limit usually survivesNo limit at all: the decision stays with the operator
Direct answerAn incorporation clause states that other documents - the sports rules, the game rules, the promotion's own conditions, the payment and services terms - form part of the agreement. They bind you because the main document says so, usually without an annexe and sometimes without a link. The two questions that follow are which version of each document applies, and whether the document was actually made available before you accepted; both are answerable from the agreement's own wording.

The sentence that does the work

§ 3.1

The incorporation clause. Typically one sentence listing categories of document by name - "the Sports Rules", "the Game Rules", "the terms of any promotion", "the payment terms" - and stating that they form part of the agreement and that the player is deemed to have read them.

§ 3.2

The live-document clause. "As amended from time to time" attached to each named document. This is what lets a set of rules change without the account terms changing, and it means the version problem exists in every incorporated document as well as in the main one.

§ 3.3

The publication clause. Where each document lives and how a change to it is notified. A document that is genuinely published and linked is in a different position from one that is named and never shown.

§ 3.4

The precedence clause. The one that decides what happens when the incorporated document and the main terms disagree - and the reason this network has a page on precedence rather than a page on documents.

What typically gets incorporated, and what it decides

Worked example - what incorporation costs to read (illustrative) Main terms: 62 numbered clauses, about 9,400 words.
Documents the incorporation clause names: 6 categories.
Words in the four that a reader would need for an ordinary dispute - account, sports rules, promotion terms, payment terms: roughly 2,100, 6,800, 1,450 and 3,300 = 13,650 words.
Total surface of the agreement: 9,400 + 13,650 = 23,050 words, which at 200 words a minute is 115 minutes to read once, and the live-document clause in § 3.2 means it is not the same document next month.
The honest conclusion from that arithmetic is not that nobody can read it. It is that reading all of it is the wrong method; finding the six sentences that decide a question is the method, and that is what the method page sets out.

Finding them, in order

  1. Search the main terms for the words "form part of". That phrase is how incorporation is written; the clause it appears in names every document you are bound by.
  2. Open each named document and note its version and date. A rules document with no version identifier cannot be pinned to the date of your bet, which is itself worth knowing before a dispute starts.
  3. Read the precedence clause before the documents. It decides which one wins, so it can make one of the others irrelevant to your question.
  4. Check whether the document was available before you accepted. Availability at the moment of acceptance is the fact that decides whether a named document was actually made part of the contract, and the confirmation e-mail is the evidence.

Why this page is not about the rules themselves

The network already has the settlement desk for how a bet is graded, the bonus desk for what a wagering multiple costs, the supply-chain desk for which build of a game is running, and the interface desk for what the screen claims. This page deliberately explains none of their subject matter. It explains the sentence that makes those documents binding, which is a different question with a different answer, and it is the question a reader is asking when they say they never agreed to a rule they have never seen.